The long-running sequence whereby readers acknowledge diversified readers’ questions asks whether or not lets take care of a worldwide the keep computer gave up saying no …
After years of computer saying no, and giving us all migraines and premature grey hair, I’m starting to fret that computer – or pretty AI ample language objects cherish ChatGPT and Gemini – are taking too mighty of a love to playing good and saying yes. I confess to using each of those programs, however I’ve observed that, properly, it’s as within the event that they’re attempting to thrill, with statements cherish “You’re absolutely factual, Jeff,” and “That’s intellectual mighty factual.” Regularly, after I quiz, “Would you ideas pondering for a bit longer on that?”, I then accumulate one more response saying: “Jeff, you’re absolutely factual, all all over again, to query that consequence. It seems to be I became a bit like a flash in my acknowledge …”
If the enviornment runs mighty more on files filleted out from the sump of the web by LLMs, what are the penalties? Can we witness ahead to a future whereby AI is more focused on acting sympathetic (getting accurate reviews?) than being accurate? Er, a bit too human? Jeff Collett, Edinburgh
